[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5428F592.3020809@i2se.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 08:00:50 +0200
From: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: lgirdwood@...il.com, shawn.guo@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
festevam@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] DT: add binding for mxs regulator
Hi Mark,
Am 28.09.2014 um 12:22 schrieb Mark Brown:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 12:59:47AM +0000, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>> This patch adds the Device tree bindings for the Freescale MXS
>> on-chip regulators.
> Use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem.
sorry i'm not sure what's wrong with the subject lines.
Did you expect "[PATCH 1/2] regulator: add binding for mxs regulator"?
>
>> +Required regulator properties:
>> +- compatible: Must be "fsl,mxs-regulator"
>> +- reg: Absolute physical address of the register set for the regulator
>> +
>> +Any regulator property defined as part of the core regulator
>> +binding, defined in regulator.txt, can also be used.
> While this should be using compatibles to identify which regulator is
> being supported note that the binding doesn't document the fact that the
> code makes regulator-name mandatory or what values are required.
Is the following better?
- fsl,mxs-regulator-vddd
- fsl,mxs-regulator-vdda
- fsl,mxs-regulator-vddio
Thanks
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists