| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:30:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org> To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com> cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>, Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>, Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, Marc Carino <marc.ceeeee@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ARM: move #include <asm/cp15.h> into cacheflush.h On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Brian Norris wrote: > There are several places where an explicit include of <asm/cp15.h> is needed > just because cacheflush.h uses one of its macros in v7_exit_coherency_flush(). > Let's put the include in the proper header. > > These obviously have some dependencies, so I'd focus on: > (1) Is patch 1 acceptable? If so, then: Well, I'm wondering if it is really a gain to force a dependency for cp15.h on every user of cacheflush.h just because of the seldomly used v7_exit_coherency_flush(). But I don't mind either ways. Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists