linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/4] x86: add phys addr validity check for /dev/mem mmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 30 Sep 2014 18:33:53 +0200
From:	Frantisek Hrbata <fhrbata@...hat.com>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	x86@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com, kamaleshb@...ibm.com,
	hechjie@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dvlasenk@...hat.com,
	prarit@...hat.com, lwoodman@...hat.com, hannsj_uhl@...ibm.com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/4] x86: add phys addr validity check for
 /dev/mem mmap

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 07:27:51AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 09/30/2014 05:41 AM, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> > Does it make sense to replace "count" with "size" so it's consistent with the
> > rest or do you prefer "nr_bytes" or as Dave proposed "len_bytes"?
> 
> I don't care what it is as long as it has a unit in it.

Hi Dave/Thomas,

I sent v2 of this patch set, which uses the "len_bytes". Again, I'm sorry I
forgot to fix this the first time.

Many thanks

-- 
Frantisek Hrbata
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/