linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/4] x86: add phys addr validity check for /dev/mem mmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1409302357290.4455@nanos>
Date:	Tue, 30 Sep 2014 23:57:46 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Frantisek Hrbata <fhrbata@...hat.com>
cc:	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	x86@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com, kamaleshb@...ibm.com,
	hechjie@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dvlasenk@...hat.com,
	prarit@...hat.com, lwoodman@...hat.com, hannsj_uhl@...ibm.com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/4] x86: add phys addr validity check for /dev/mem
 mmap

On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 07:27:51AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On 09/30/2014 05:41 AM, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> > > Does it make sense to replace "count" with "size" so it's consistent with the
> > > rest or do you prefer "nr_bytes" or as Dave proposed "len_bytes"?
> > 
> > I don't care what it is as long as it has a unit in it.
> 
> Hi Dave/Thomas,
> 
> I sent v2 of this patch set, which uses the "len_bytes". Again, I'm sorry I
> forgot to fix this the first time.

No problem. Shit happens.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/