linux-kernel - Re: pipe/page fault oddness.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140930164047.GA18354@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Sep 2014 12:40:47 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: pipe/page fault oddness.

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:22:01PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
 
 > [<ffffffff91167913>] ? trace_graph_entry+0x123/0x250
 > [<ffffffff9115b7ce>] ? trace_buffer_lock_reserve+0x1e/0x60
 > [<ffffffff911c3c67>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x3a7/0xcd0
 > [<ffffffff910ce68d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
 > [<ffffffff911678f8>] ? trace_graph_entry+0x108/0x250
 > [<ffffffff91042d14>] ? __do_page_fault+0x234/0x600
 > [<ffffffff9103ad23>] ? prepare_ftrace_return+0x73/0xe0
 > [<ffffffff910ca040>] ? down_write_nested+0xc0/0xc0
 > [<ffffffff910ac74d>] ? get_parent_ip+0xd/0x50
 > [<ffffffff91042d14>] ? __do_page_fault+0x234/0x600
 > [<ffffffff9103ad23>] ? prepare_ftrace_return+0x73/0xe0
 > [<ffffffff91826b3a>] ? ftrace_graph_caller+0x5a/0x85
 > [<ffffffff913a5ebe>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
 > [<ffffffff9118eda7>] ? context_tracking_user_exit+0x67/0x1b0
 > [<ffffffff910430fe>] ? do_page_fault+0x1e/0x70
 > [<ffffffff913a5efd>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x3a/0x3c
 > [<ffffffff911bd7e3>] ? copy_page_to_iter+0x3b3/0x500
 > [<ffffffff9120eddf>] ? pipe_read+0xdf/0x330
 > [<ffffffff9120ed00>] ? pipe_write+0x490/0x490
 > [<ffffffff912051a0>] ? do_sync_readv_writev+0xa0/0xa0
 > [<ffffffff912053b8>] ? do_iter_readv_writev+0x78/0xc0
 > [<ffffffff91206bbe>] ? do_readv_writev+0xce/0x280
 > [<ffffffff9120ed00>] ? pipe_write+0x490/0x490
 > [<ffffffff910cbbf6>] ? lock_release_holdtime.part.29+0xe6/0x160
 > [<ffffffff910ac74d>] ? get_parent_ip+0xd/0x50
 > [<ffffffff910ac74d>] ? get_parent_ip+0xd/0x50
 > [<ffffffff910ac8ab>] ? preempt_count_sub+0x6b/0xf0
 > [<ffffffff91206da9>] ? vfs_readv+0x39/0x50
 > [<ffffffff91206e6c>] ? SyS_readv+0x5c/0x100
 > [<ffffffff918249e4>] ? tracesys+0xdd/0xe2
 > 
 > That second one is odd, because I had disabled all the function tracing
 > before doing the sysrq-t, so still seeing all the ftrace stuff on the
 > stack suprised me.

ah, echo 0 > tracing_on isn't enough, I had to 0 out set_ftrace_pid too.
Never mind.  Subsequent traces all looking the same, minus the tracing
junk though.

Is there some way I can figure out what address it's faulting on ?
I wonder if that might give some clues.

	Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/