linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: dts: apq8064 DT patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:45:52 -0700
From:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
To:	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc:	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	broonie@...nel.org, lee.jones@...aro.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	arm@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: dts: apq8064 DT patches

Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org> writes:

> These patches adds dt nodes for RPM, USB and SATA IPs found in APQ8064.
> All the driver support for these IPs are already available in v3.17, except
> the RPM driver which is now accepted by Lee and Mark.
>
> These patches depend on the header file from 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg364310.html
> for regulators.
>
> Now that the RPM patch is accepted, should RPM patch go via arm-soc tree?
> so that we can get more functionality on IFC6410 board in v3.18 mainline.
>
> All these patches are tested on IFC6410 board.
> Am hoping to get these patches for v3.18, as these patches were sitting in
> my dev tree since last 3 merge windows.

A nit on process, for future reference:

You only need to send to arm@...nel.org if you're expecting the arm-soc
maintainers to directly apply the patches or pull request.

In this case, it seems like stuff that the qcom maintainers will queue
up in their DT branch, and then submit to arm-soc maintainers.

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/