linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: Quark: Add legacy_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1410010153590.4455@nanos>
Date:	Wed, 1 Oct 2014 02:11:58 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@...us-software.ie>
cc:	mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, davej@...hat.com, hmh@....eng.br,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: Quark: Add legacy_cache_size and TLB comments

Bryan,

On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:

what are you trying to achieve by sending out patches faster than
anyone can review?

Doing this has an obvious outcome:

  1) The patches you whip up 10 seconds after the review hits your
     inbox are likely not to be well thought out. Neither are the
     changelogs.

     Just by skimming the lot I noticed at least two issues which you
     just mechanically fixed up without applying any thought. I'm not
     going to tell you, simply because you are starting to abuse and
     waste my time.

  2) Keeping #1 as your modus operandi will make sure that you get on
     the backlog list of reviewers and maintainers and in the worst
     case on the shitlist.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/