linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: Quark: Add legacy_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <542B4B16.6060401@nexus-software.ie>
Date:	Wed, 01 Oct 2014 01:30:14 +0100
From:	Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@...us-software.ie>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:	mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, davej@...hat.com, hmh@....eng.br,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: Quark: Add legacy_cache_size and TLB comments

On 01/10/14 01:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Bryan,
>
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>
> what are you trying to achieve by sending out patches faster than
> anyone can review?

Thomas.

That's not the intention at all.

> Doing this has an obvious outcome:
>
>    1) The patches you whip up 10 seconds after the review hits your
>       inbox are likely not to be well thought out. Neither are the
>       changelogs.
>
>       Just by skimming the lot I noticed at least two issues which you
>       just mechanically fixed up without applying any thought. I'm not
>       going to tell you, simply because you are starting to abuse and
>       waste my time.
>
>    2) Keeping #1 as your modus operandi will make sure that you get on
>       the backlog list of reviewers and maintainers and in the worst
>       case on the shitlist.

1)
OK, I take your point on the frequency.

2)
On the substance.
I'm certainly not trying to antagonise you here - I assumed you were 
*suggesting* to apply those comments directly ?
Which is why I updated the sent patches with your comments - since they 
seemed more descriptive anyway - and sent back to the list.


Thanks,
Bryan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/