linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86_64,entry: Filter RFLAGS.NT on entry from userspace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALCETrXo-tvQOJ8Cg1d1wkQm=5095VdESq0SBUH4MivZWH8iQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 1 Oct 2014 07:46:54 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@...il.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Sebastian Lackner <sebastian@...-team.de>,
	Anish Bhatt <anish@...lsio.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86_64,entry: Filter RFLAGS.NT on entry from userspace

On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 09:09:13 -0500
> Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 21:51:27 -0700
>> Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>>
>> > The NT flag doesn't do anything in long mode other than causing IRET
>> > to #GP.  Oddly, CPL3 code can still set NT using popf.
>> >
>> > Entry via hardware or software interrupt clears NT automatically, so
>> > the only relevant entries are fast syscalls.
>> >
>> > If user code causes kernel code to run with NT set, then there's at
>> > least some (small) chance that it could cause trouble.  For example,
>> > user code could cause a call to EFI code with NT set, and who knows
>> > what would happen?  Apparently some games on Wine sometimes do
>> > this (!), and, if an IRET return happens, they will segfault.  That
>> > segfault cannot be handled, because signal delivery fails, too.
>> >
>> > This patch programs the CPU to clear NT on entry via SYSCALL (both
>> > 32-bit and 64-bit, by my reading of the AMD APM), and it clears NT
>> > in software on entry via SYSENTER.
>> >
>> > To save a few cycles, this borrows a trick from Jan Beulich in Xen:
>> > it checks whether NT is set before trying to clear it.  As a result,
>> > it seems to have very little effect on SYSENTER performance on my
>> > machine.
>> >
>> > Testers beware: on Xen, SYSENTER with NT set turns into a GPF.
>> >
>> > I haven't touched anything on 32-bit kernels.
>> >
>> > The syscall mask change comes from a variant of this patch by Anish
>> > Bhatt.
>> >
>> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>> > Reported-by: Anish Bhatt <anish@...lsio.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
>> > ---
>> >  arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S    | 12 ++++++++++++
>> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c |  2 +-
>> >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S b/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S
>> > index 4299eb05023c..44d1dd371454 100644
>> > --- a/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S
>> > +++ b/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S
>> > @@ -151,6 +151,18 @@ ENTRY(ia32_sysenter_target)
>> >  1: movl    (%rbp),%ebp
>> >     _ASM_EXTABLE(1b,ia32_badarg)
>> >     ASM_CLAC
>> > +
>> > +   /*
>> > +    * Sysenter doesn't filter flags, so we need to clear NT
>> > +    * ourselves.  To save a few cycles, we can check whether
>> > +    * NT was set instead of doing an unconditional popfq.
>> > +    */
>> > +   testl $X86_EFLAGS_NT,EFLAGS(%rsp)       /* saved EFLAGS match cpu */
>> > +   jz 1f
>> > +   pushq_cfi $(X86_EFLAGS_IF|X86_EFLAGS_FIXED)
>> > +   popfq_cfi
>> > +1:
>> > +
>>
>> I think you've gone backwards with this version. The earlier one got
>> some of the performance loss back by not needing to do the "cld" insn.
>>
>> You should just replace that "cld" (line 146) with
>>
>>       pushfq_cfi $2
>>       popfq_cfi
>>
>> Unfortunately I'm not set up to test that yet. But I did look at
>> the SDM and can't see a need to preserve any of the flags.
>>
>
>
> <sigh> that's:
>
>         pushfw_cfi $0x202
>
> IF needs to stay on because we've already enabled interrupts after
> sysenter.

I tried exactly this.  It was much slower than the version I sent.

--Andy

-- 
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/