linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86_64,entry: Filter RFLAGS.NT on entry from userspace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141001095603.3d5103d9@as>
Date:	Wed, 1 Oct 2014 09:56:03 -0500
From:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@...il.com>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Sebastian Lackner <sebastian@...-team.de>,
	Anish Bhatt <anish@...lsio.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86_64,entry: Filter RFLAGS.NT on entry from
 userspace

On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 07:46:54 -0700
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 09:09:13 -0500
> > Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 21:51:27 -0700
> >> Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> > The NT flag doesn't do anything in long mode other than causing IRET
> >> > to #GP.  Oddly, CPL3 code can still set NT using popf.
> >> >
> >> > Entry via hardware or software interrupt clears NT automatically, so
> >> > the only relevant entries are fast syscalls.
> >> >
> >> > If user code causes kernel code to run with NT set, then there's at
> >> > least some (small) chance that it could cause trouble.  For example,
> >> > user code could cause a call to EFI code with NT set, and who knows
> >> > what would happen?  Apparently some games on Wine sometimes do
> >> > this (!), and, if an IRET return happens, they will segfault.  That
> >> > segfault cannot be handled, because signal delivery fails, too.
> >> >
> >> > This patch programs the CPU to clear NT on entry via SYSCALL (both
> >> > 32-bit and 64-bit, by my reading of the AMD APM), and it clears NT
> >> > in software on entry via SYSENTER.
> >> >
> >> > To save a few cycles, this borrows a trick from Jan Beulich in Xen:
> >> > it checks whether NT is set before trying to clear it.  As a result,
> >> > it seems to have very little effect on SYSENTER performance on my
> >> > machine.
> >> >
> >> > Testers beware: on Xen, SYSENTER with NT set turns into a GPF.
> >> >
> >> > I haven't touched anything on 32-bit kernels.
> >> >
> >> > The syscall mask change comes from a variant of this patch by Anish
> >> > Bhatt.
> >> >
> >> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> >> > Reported-by: Anish Bhatt <anish@...lsio.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
> >> > ---
> >> >  arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S    | 12 ++++++++++++
> >> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c |  2 +-
> >> >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S b/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S
> >> > index 4299eb05023c..44d1dd371454 100644
> >> > --- a/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S
> >> > +++ b/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S
> >> > @@ -151,6 +151,18 @@ ENTRY(ia32_sysenter_target)
> >> >  1: movl    (%rbp),%ebp
> >> >     _ASM_EXTABLE(1b,ia32_badarg)
> >> >     ASM_CLAC
> >> > +
> >> > +   /*
> >> > +    * Sysenter doesn't filter flags, so we need to clear NT
> >> > +    * ourselves.  To save a few cycles, we can check whether
> >> > +    * NT was set instead of doing an unconditional popfq.
> >> > +    */
> >> > +   testl $X86_EFLAGS_NT,EFLAGS(%rsp)       /* saved EFLAGS match cpu */
> >> > +   jz 1f
> >> > +   pushq_cfi $(X86_EFLAGS_IF|X86_EFLAGS_FIXED)
> >> > +   popfq_cfi
> >> > +1:
> >> > +
> >>
> >> I think you've gone backwards with this version. The earlier one got
> >> some of the performance loss back by not needing to do the "cld" insn.
> >>
> >> You should just replace that "cld" (line 146) with
> >>
> >>       pushfq_cfi $2
> >>       popfq_cfi
> >>
> >> Unfortunately I'm not set up to test that yet. But I did look at
> >> the SDM and can't see a need to preserve any of the flags.
> >>
> >
> >
> > <sigh> that's:
> >
> >         pushfw_cfi $0x202
> >
> > IF needs to stay on because we've already enabled interrupts after
> > sysenter.
> 
> I tried exactly this.  It was much slower than the version I sent.
> 

Yeah, it looks like a new paravirt op that enables interrupts and
clears all the other flags would be the only way to do this without at
least some impact on performance.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/