lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <542C1B9A.4050704@zytor.com>
Date:	Wed, 01 Oct 2014 08:19:54 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Sebastian Lackner <sebastian@...-team.de>
CC:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Anish Bhatt <anish@...lsio.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@...il.com>,
	stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86_64,entry: Filter RFLAGS.NT on entry from userspace

On 09/30/2014 10:24 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Sebastian Lackner
> <sebastian@...-team.de> wrote:
>>> +     testl $X86_EFLAGS_NT,EFLAGS(%rsp)       /* saved EFLAGS match cpu */
>>> +     jz 1f
>>> +     pushq_cfi $(X86_EFLAGS_IF|X86_EFLAGS_FIXED)
>>> +     popfq_cfi
>>> +1:
>>> +
>>
>> Do you think it makes sense to change the order here, so that no jump happens if
>> NT is not set (which happens a bit more often, than the other way round)? Just a
>> guess though, haven't measured if pipeline effects have such a big influence in this
>> case. ;)
>>
> 
> It should be immeasurable in a tight loop, since it will predict
> correctly almost every time.  And, unless cfi state works across
> .pushsection (does it?), getting the cfi annotations right will be
> more complicated.
> 

It does, actually... otherwise it would be almost impossible to use in a
lot of cases.

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ