[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <542C1C28.9050408@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 08:22:16 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
CC: Sebastian Lackner <sebastian@...-team.de>,
Anish Bhatt <anish@...lsio.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86_64,entry: Filter RFLAGS.NT on entry from userspace
On 09/30/2014 09:51 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S b/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S
> index 4299eb05023c..44d1dd371454 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S
> @@ -151,6 +151,18 @@ ENTRY(ia32_sysenter_target)
> 1: movl (%rbp),%ebp
> _ASM_EXTABLE(1b,ia32_badarg)
> ASM_CLAC
> +
> + /*
> + * Sysenter doesn't filter flags, so we need to clear NT
> + * ourselves. To save a few cycles, we can check whether
> + * NT was set instead of doing an unconditional popfq.
> + */
> + testl $X86_EFLAGS_NT,EFLAGS(%rsp) /* saved EFLAGS match cpu */
> + jz 1f
> + pushq_cfi $(X86_EFLAGS_IF|X86_EFLAGS_FIXED)
> + popfq_cfi
> +1:
> +
I'm wondering if it would be easier to just remove ASM_CLAC and do this
unconditionally. On SMAP-enabled hardware then that gives us back some
of the cycles, may make the branch unnecessary.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists