linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86_64,entry: Filter RFLAGS.NT on entry from userspace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALCETrU2_tS-tmWAkW0vscOqQ89JrRrnjCA3P1aiZM-Xvj_oMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 1 Oct 2014 08:50:21 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Sebastian Lackner <sebastian@...-team.de>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Anish Bhatt <anish@...lsio.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@...il.com>,
	stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86_64,entry: Filter RFLAGS.NT on entry from userspace

On Oct 1, 2014 8:26 AM, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/01/2014 08:22 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 09/30/2014 09:51 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S b/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S
> >> index 4299eb05023c..44d1dd371454 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S
> >> @@ -151,6 +151,18 @@ ENTRY(ia32_sysenter_target)
> >>  1:  movl    (%rbp),%ebp
> >>      _ASM_EXTABLE(1b,ia32_badarg)
> >>      ASM_CLAC
> >> +
> >> +    /*
> >> +     * Sysenter doesn't filter flags, so we need to clear NT
> >> +     * ourselves.  To save a few cycles, we can check whether
> >> +     * NT was set instead of doing an unconditional popfq.
> >> +     */
> >> +    testl $X86_EFLAGS_NT,EFLAGS(%rsp)       /* saved EFLAGS match cpu */
> >> +    jz 1f
> >> +    pushq_cfi $(X86_EFLAGS_IF|X86_EFLAGS_FIXED)
> >> +    popfq_cfi
> >> +1:
> >> +
> >
> > I'm wondering if it would be easier to just remove ASM_CLAC and do this
> > unconditionally.  On SMAP-enabled hardware then that gives us back some
> > of the cycles, may make the branch unnecessary.
> >
>
> Heck, we can drop the CLD and the STI as well (with some tweaking in
> ia32_badarg.)

I prototyped this, and performance sucked.  I suspect that cld and sti
are fairly well optimized, that I ended up introducing stalls due to
stack manipulation, and that Sandy Bridge's popfq microcode is just
not that fast.  Maybe I did it wrong.  Dunno.  Also, I can't benchmark
a SMAP machine, since I don't have one.  (Does anyone?  I'm currently
tempted to wait for Skylake before upgrading all my systems.)

In fact, I think we should change all the irqrestore code to do

if (flags & X86_EFLAFS_IF)
        sti;

I can send a v3 with the unlikely code moved out of line.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/