[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141002155217.GH32147@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 16:52:18 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Andrew Pinski <apinski@...ium.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"pinskia@...il.com" <pinskia@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 00/24] ILP32 support in ARM64
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:18:54PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> New version with all of the requested changes. Updated to the latest sources.
>
> Notable changes from the previous versions:
> VDSO code has been factored out to be easier to understand and easier to maintain.
> Move the config option to the last thing that gets added.
> Added some extra COMPAT_* macros for core dumping for easier usage.
Apart from a few comments I've made, I would also like to see non-empty
commit logs and long line wrapping (both in commit logs and
Documentation/). Otherwise, the patches look fine.
So what are the next steps? Are the glibc folk ok with the ILP32 Linux
ABI? On the kernel side, what I would like to see:
1. LTP results (in all combinations of AArch32, LP64, ILP32, big and
little endian)
2. A way for us to reproduce the ILP32 tests - at which point could we
get a toolchain? Ideally a filesystem as well, though maybe we could
just use a busybox in the meantime.
Thanks.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists