[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-f10e00f4bf360c36edbe6bf18a6c75b171cbe012@git.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 22:28:20 -0700
From: tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sasha.levin@...cle.com,
ktkhai@...allels.com, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/dl: Use dl_bw_of()
under rcu_read_lock_sched()
Commit-ID: f10e00f4bf360c36edbe6bf18a6c75b171cbe012
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/f10e00f4bf360c36edbe6bf18a6c75b171cbe012
Author: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 12:23:37 +0400
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 05:46:58 +0200
sched/dl: Use dl_bw_of() under rcu_read_lock_sched()
rq->rd is freed using call_rcu_sched(), so rcu_read_lock() to access it
is not enough. We should use either rcu_read_lock_sched() or preempt_disable().
Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Fixes: 66339c31bc39 "sched: Use dl_bw_of() under RCU read lock"
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1412065417.20287.24.camel@tkhai
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index b5349fe..c84bdc0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5264,6 +5264,7 @@ static int sched_cpu_inactive(struct notifier_block *nfb,
{
unsigned long flags;
long cpu = (long)hcpu;
+ struct dl_bw *dl_b;
switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
@@ -5271,15 +5272,19 @@ static int sched_cpu_inactive(struct notifier_block *nfb,
/* explicitly allow suspend */
if (!(action & CPU_TASKS_FROZEN)) {
- struct dl_bw *dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
bool overflow;
int cpus;
+ rcu_read_lock_sched();
+ dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
+
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
cpus = dl_bw_cpus(cpu);
overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, 0, 0);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
+ rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+
if (overflow)
return notifier_from_errno(-EBUSY);
}
@@ -7647,11 +7652,10 @@ static int sched_dl_global_constraints(void)
u64 runtime = global_rt_runtime();
u64 period = global_rt_period();
u64 new_bw = to_ratio(period, runtime);
+ struct dl_bw *dl_b;
int cpu, ret = 0;
unsigned long flags;
- rcu_read_lock();
-
/*
* Here we want to check the bandwidth not being set to some
* value smaller than the currently allocated bandwidth in
@@ -7662,25 +7666,27 @@ static int sched_dl_global_constraints(void)
* solutions is welcome!
*/
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- struct dl_bw *dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
+ rcu_read_lock_sched();
+ dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
if (new_bw < dl_b->total_bw)
ret = -EBUSY;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
+ rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+
if (ret)
break;
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
-
return ret;
}
static void sched_dl_do_global(void)
{
u64 new_bw = -1;
+ struct dl_bw *dl_b;
int cpu;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -7690,18 +7696,19 @@ static void sched_dl_do_global(void)
if (global_rt_runtime() != RUNTIME_INF)
new_bw = to_ratio(global_rt_period(), global_rt_runtime());
- rcu_read_lock();
/*
* FIXME: As above...
*/
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- struct dl_bw *dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
+ rcu_read_lock_sched();
+ dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
dl_b->bw = new_bw;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
+
+ rcu_read_unlock_sched();
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
}
static int sched_rt_global_validate(void)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists