[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141006110115.GH25202@ulmo>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 13:01:16 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Yao <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/11] ARM: at91/dt: add LCD panel description to
sama5d3xdm.dtsi
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 04:53:07PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3xdm.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3xdm.dtsi
[...]
> + bl_reg: backlight_regulator {
> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> + regulator-name = "backlight-power-supply";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> + panel_reg: panel_regulator {
> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> + regulator-name = "panel-power-supply";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> + backlight: backlight {
> + compatible = "pwm-backlight";
> + pwms = <&hlcdc_pwm 0 50000 0>;
> + brightness-levels = <0 4 8 16 32 64 128 255>;
> + default-brightness-level = <6>;
> + power-supply = <&bl_reg>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
Why are these all disabled? Patch 11/11 now needs to enable all of them
explicitly for each board that uses this display module.
> + panel: panel {
> + compatible = "foxlink,fl500wvr00-a0t", "simple-panel";
"simple-panel" shouldn't be in this list. There's nothing useful a
driver can do by matching on it.
> + backlight = <&backlight>;
> + power-supply = <&panel_reg>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + status = "disabled";
> +
> + port@0 {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + panel_input: endpoint@0 {
> + reg = <0>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&hlcdc_panel_output>;
> + };
> };
There's no support for OF graphs in simple-panel, so this is unused,
isn't it?
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists