linux-kernel - Regulator: Questions about constraints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1486422791.288728.1412617735622.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbaltgw54.schlund.de>
Date:	Mon, 6 Oct 2014 19:48:55 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
To:	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Regulator: Questions about constraints

Hi,

currently i'm porting a regulator driver and i've two question about regulator
constraints and DT binding:

Should a regulator driver rely on DT regulator constraints or not?

In case the constraints are not set by DT, what is the recommend behavior of a
regulator driver?

Best regards

Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/