linux-kernel - Re: Regulator: Questions about constraints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141006184119.GS4609@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 6 Oct 2014 19:41:19 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regulator: Questions about constraints

On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 07:48:55PM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:

> Should a regulator driver rely on DT regulator constraints or not?

> In case the constraints are not set by DT, what is the recommend behavior of a
> regulator driver?

The regulator driver should just pass any constraints it gets to the
core, it shouldn't look at them or care if there are none.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)