[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141006184725.GA1152@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 19:47:25 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, graeme.gregory@...aro.org,
marc.zyngier@....com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, astone@...hat.com,
grant.likely@...aro.org, hanjun.guo@...aro.org,
Sudeep.Holla@....com, olof@...om.net, jason@...edaemon.net,
"Duran, Leo" <leo.duran@....com>, Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ata: ahci_platform: Add ACPI support for AMD Seattle
SATA controller
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 08:44:35PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 06 October 2014 19:21:53 Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Unfortunately not. I'd assume that PM registers are expected to be
> > accessed via the _PS* methods instead. Does MSI make sense outside the
> > context of PCI interrupts?
>
> Yes, the ARM GIC has a weird sense of what MSI is used for, and
> apparently some SoC vendors have started using MSI by default for
> all on-chip peripherals.
>
> A patch series to extend MSI to platform devices is currently
> under review.
Mm. Yeah, it doesn't seem like there's any ACPI-defined mechanism for
MSI control. Let's chat about this next week?
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists