[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141007081732.GF19379@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 10:17:32 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Jet Chen <jet.chen@...el.com>, Su Tao <tao.su@...el.com>,
Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...el.com>, LKP <lkp@...org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [perf] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
00000085
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 01:03:48PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > What is lacking is the actual .config.
>
> Sorry, attached the .config. I expected the script to auto attach it,
> but obviously it's not yet perfect and failed to attach .config in
> this case.
Sure no problem, just figured I'd tell you.
> > Also the times above (~285 seconds) seem to suggest userspace needs to
> > do something ?
>
> It's trinity. I'll try upgrade it, but it seems be valid for trinity
> to feed kernel with any parameters that it can accept -- unless the
> kernel completely rejects it one day.
OK, does it make sense to augment that script you have with a trinity
parameter? Maybe have that userspace read the kernel cmdline and also
run trinity when observed?
That way you can provide full reproduction environments, which it
appears you're striving towards.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists