[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141007084044.GA12300@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 16:40:44 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Jet Chen <jet.chen@...el.com>, Su Tao <tao.su@...el.com>,
Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...el.com>, LKP <lkp@...org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [perf] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
00000085
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 10:17:32AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 01:03:48PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > What is lacking is the actual .config.
> >
> > Sorry, attached the .config. I expected the script to auto attach it,
> > but obviously it's not yet perfect and failed to attach .config in
> > this case.
>
> Sure no problem, just figured I'd tell you.
>
> > > Also the times above (~285 seconds) seem to suggest userspace needs to
> > > do something ?
> >
> > It's trinity. I'll try upgrade it, but it seems be valid for trinity
> > to feed kernel with any parameters that it can accept -- unless the
> > kernel completely rejects it one day.
>
> OK, does it make sense to augment that script you have with a trinity
> parameter? Maybe have that userspace read the kernel cmdline and also
> run trinity when observed? That way you can provide full
> reproduction environments, which it appears you're striving towards.
The trinity binary is included in the initrd image that it downloads,
and will auto run after boot up. I also plan to add trinity as a LKP
test case. :)
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists