lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 7 Oct 2014 17:28:55 +0200
From:	Tomeu Vizoso <>
To:	Stephen Boyd <>
Cc:	Russell King <>,
	Mike Turquette <>,
	Paul Walmsley <>,
	Tony Lindgren <>,,
	"" <>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: Make clk API return per-user struct clk instances

On 4 October 2014 01:15, Stephen Boyd <> wrote:
> On 10/02, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> +
>>  #if defined(CONFIG_OF) && defined(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK)
> These ifdefs look useless.
>>  struct clk *of_clk_get_by_clkspec(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec);
>>  struct clk *__of_clk_get_from_provider(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec);
>>  void of_clk_lock(void);
>>  void of_clk_unlock(void);
>>  #endif
>> +
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK)
> So we shouldn't need this one either.

Actually, i had to put it back so clkdev.c builds on
!CONFIG_COMMON_CLK. Do you have another idea on how to deal with this?

Sorry, but I forgot to CC you on v2 (just sent):


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists