[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54343449.1020605@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 11:43:21 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
CC: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: Make clk API return per-user struct clk instances
On 10/07/2014 08:28 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On 4 October 2014 01:15, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> On 10/02, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>> +
>>> #if defined(CONFIG_OF) && defined(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK)
>> These ifdefs look useless.
>>
>>> struct clk *of_clk_get_by_clkspec(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec);
>>> struct clk *__of_clk_get_from_provider(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec);
>>> void of_clk_lock(void);
>>> void of_clk_unlock(void);
>>> #endif
>>> +
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK)
>> So we shouldn't need this one either.
> Actually, i had to put it back so clkdev.c builds on
> !CONFIG_COMMON_CLK. Do you have another idea on how to deal with this?
What's the error? Probably need to add a forward declaration for struct
clk, struct of_phandle_args, and struct clk_hw.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists