[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=UNXUuJbRpECV0Ay0hR02Dg=rBw+XScvMdfngzWfCqp4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 10:03:19 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>,
Addy Ke <addy.ke@...k-chips.com>,
Eddie Cai <cf@...k-chips.com>, Jianqun Xu <xjq@...k-chips.com>,
han jiang <hj@...k-chips.com>,
Tao Huang <huangtao@...k-chips.com>,
戴克霖 (Jack) <dkl@...k-chips.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: enable init rate for clock
Kever,
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com> wrote:
> We need to initialize PLL rate and some of bus clock rate while
> kernel init, for there is no other module will do that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
> ---
>
> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
> index 874e66d..2f4519b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
> @@ -455,6 +455,16 @@
> rockchip,grf = <&grf>;
> #clock-cells = <1>;
> #reset-cells = <1>;
> + assigned-clocks = <&cru PLL_GPLL>, <&cru PLL_CPLL>,
> + <&cru PLL_NPLL>, <&cru ACLK_CPU>,
> + <&cru HCLK_CPU>, <&cru PCLK_CPU>,
> + <&cru ACLK_PERI>, <&cru HCLK_PERI>,
> + <&cru PCLK_PERI>;
> + assigned-clock-rates = <594000000>, <400000000>,
> + <500000000>, <300000000>,
When I boot up, I see that ACLK_CPU was 297000000. You specified
300000000. Did you expect to get 300? If you expected 297, I think
you should put 297. If you expected 300 then we have some debugging
to do. Note: I'm not quite sure how you'd expect to get 300 given
that none of the PLLs divide evenly to 300...
> + <150000000>, <75000000>,
Similarly, I see 148500000, 74250000
> + <300000000>, <150000000>,
297000000, 148500000
> + <75000000>;
74250000
> };
>
> grf: syscon@...70000 {
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists