linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 02/17] security: make security_file_set_fowner, f_setown and __f

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 7 Oct 2014 20:34:57 +0300
From:	Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...marydata.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/17] security: make security_file_set_fowner,
 f_setown and __f_setown void return

On 7 October 2014 20:17, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 08:11:42PM +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
>> If file_set_fowner op is now type of "void", how you can actually
>> return the value?
>> I think compiler must give error. How could you compile it?
>
> Returning void values is a GNU extension.  I've seen it in a few
> places in the kernel.  Although in general I'd prefer it we'd remove
> it (and have the compiler warn about it).
>

Cool. There were patches around to use LLVM as well.
Will it work there?

-- 
Thanks,
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/