[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1412760633.13569.4.camel@iivanov-dev>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 12:30:33 +0300
From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Input: pmic8xxx-keypad - use regmap_field for
register access
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 12:13 +0300, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 10:26 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Ivan,
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 12:50:46PM +0300, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> > > @@ -527,10 +538,55 @@ static int pmic8xxx_kp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >
>
> > > +
> > > + kp->row_hold = devm_regmap_field_alloc(kp->dev, kp->regmap,
> > > + info->row_hold);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(kp->row_hold))
> > > + return PTR_ERR(kp->row_hold);
> >
> > Why do we have to allocate all regmap fields separately instead of
> > embedding them into keypad structure?
> >
>
> No particular reason. Will rework it.
>
Oops. struct regmap_field is opaque. It seems that the allocation
is the only way that I could have instance of it.
Regards,
Ivan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists