[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54357BA7.3010609@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 11:00:07 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>
CC: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Input: pmic8xxx-keypad - use regmap_field for register
access
On 10/08/2014 02:30 AM, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 12:13 +0300, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
>> On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 10:26 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>> Hi Ivan,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 12:50:46PM +0300, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
>>>> @@ -527,10 +538,55 @@ static int pmic8xxx_kp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + kp->row_hold = devm_regmap_field_alloc(kp->dev, kp->regmap,
>>>> + info->row_hold);
>>>> + if (IS_ERR(kp->row_hold))
>>>> + return PTR_ERR(kp->row_hold);
>>> Why do we have to allocate all regmap fields separately instead of
>>> embedding them into keypad structure?
>>>
>> No particular reason. Will rework it.
>>
> Oops. struct regmap_field is opaque. It seems that the allocation
> is the only way that I could have instance of it.
>
Maybe we can add an API to allocate an array of fields?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists