lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 16:24:55 +0200 From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr Subject: Re: [RFC] drop owner assignment from platform_drivers On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 07:51:46AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > I missed the one code path you pointed out, and that should be fixed, > > but that doesn't mean that the original patch should be reverted, as it > > is the way we want things to be, let's just fix up the bug and move on. > > OK, that is a clear statement. > > So, what is your opinion on the original cleanup series removing > unnecessary '.owner = THIS_MODULE' lines in drivers? Helpful? Noise? Helpful, please do it. I can take it all through my driver-core tree if you want, that might make things easier for others. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists