linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] drop owner assignment from platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141012055146.GA1310@katana>
Date:	Sun, 12 Oct 2014 07:51:46 +0200
From:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	cocci@...teme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [RFC] drop owner assignment from platform_drivers


> I missed the one code path you pointed out, and that should be fixed,
> but that doesn't mean that the original patch should be reverted, as it
> is the way we want things to be, let's just fix up the bug and move on.

OK, that is a clear statement.

So, what is your opinion on the original cleanup series removing
unnecessary '.owner = THIS_MODULE' lines in drivers? Helpful? Noise?

Thanks,

   Wolfram


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)