linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: dgap: re-arrange functions for removing forward declarations.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141013032544.GA26646@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Oct 2014 05:25:44 +0200
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@...il.com>
Cc:	lidza.louina@...il.com, markh@...pro.net,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dan.carpenter@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: dgap: re-arrange functions for removing forward
 declarations.

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:34:25AM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote:
> Re-arrange the functions for removing forward declarations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@...il.com>
> ---
> This patch has too many changes for re-arranging the functions.
> So I wonder that I should break this up into smaller patches.

Are the .o files identical before and after this patch?  If so, it's
fine.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/