linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: baytrail: show output gpio state correctly on Intel Baytrail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141013201915.GD4034@psi-dev26.jf.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:19:15 -0700
From:	David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Cc:	linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: baytrail: show output gpio state correctly on
 Intel Baytrail

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 02:36:18PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 02:26:32PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:24:04PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 02:14:05PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:23:59AM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> > > > > Even if a gpio pin is set to output, we still need to set INPUT_EN bit
> > > > 
> > > > here you say you're setting that bit.
> > > > 
> > > > > to be able to read its value. Without this change, we'll always read low
> > > > > level state.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v3.14+
> > > > > Signed-off-by: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'm resending same v1 patch but now copying linux stable and linux gpio.
> > > > > This patch is meant for all linux stable trees >= v3.14.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Br, David
> > > > > ---
> > > > > 
> > > > >  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c | 2 +-
> > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> > > > > index e12e5b07f6d7..c23d8ded936d 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> > > > > @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static int byt_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> > > > >  		"Potential Error: Setting GPIO with direct_irq_en to output");
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	reg_val = readl(reg) | BYT_DIR_MASK;
> > > > > -	reg_val &= ~BYT_OUTPUT_EN;
> > > > > +	reg_val &= ~(BYT_OUTPUT_EN | BYT_INPUT_EN);
> > > > 
> > > > but code is clearing it. Also, you're not patching byt_gpio_get(), so
> > > > you can't be 'reading its value' either. Quite frankly, this looks very
> > > > fishy to me. Comments on BYT_OUTPUT_EN and BYT_INPUT_EN states that
> > > > those bits are active low, meaning that clearing them enables that
> > > > particular feature.
> > > > 
> > > > How can you enable a pin to be both OUTPUT and INPUT ? Look like what
> > > > you really want is:
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> > > > index e12e5b0..69f882d 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> > > > @@ -290,6 +290,7 @@ static int byt_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
> > > >  
> > > >  	value = readl(reg) | BYT_DIR_MASK;
> > > >  	value &= ~BYT_INPUT_EN;		/* active low */
> > > > +	value |= BYT_OUTPUT_EN;		/* disable output */
> > > >  	writel(value, reg);
> > > >  
> > > >  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vg->lock, flags);
> > > > @@ -319,6 +320,7 @@ static int byt_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> > > >  
> > > >  	reg_val = readl(reg) | BYT_DIR_MASK;
> > > >  	reg_val &= ~BYT_OUTPUT_EN;
> > > > +	value |= BYT_INPUT_EN;		/* disable input */
> > > >  
> > > >  	if (value)
> > > >  		writel(reg_val | BYT_LEVEL, reg);
> > > > 
> > > > completely untested however. Care to further explain why clearing both
> > > > bits - thus enabling both INPUT and OUTPUT - is correct ?
> > > 
> > > Actually I really meant what I sent, but perhaps I misspoke during
> > > explanation. We need to clear the bit to enable the functionality.
> > > 
> > > !BYT_INPUT_EN allows us to read the value. !BYT_OUTPUT_EN allows us to
> > > set a value. If we want to set a value (acting as output) and still be
> > > able to read via sysfs, we need to set both functionality (i.e. clear
> > > both bits).
> > > 
> > > I'll resend the patch with a better comment.
> > 
> > Alright, just make sure that exposing a pin through sysfs and making it
> > output high, then later switching it to input works. It looks like
> > byt_gpio_direction_input() still needs to make sure OUTPUT is set.
> 
> I also noticed that this is missing:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> index e12e5b0..7db5ab9 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> @@ -614,3 +614,9 @@ static int __init byt_gpio_init(void)
>  }
>  
>  subsys_initcall(byt_gpio_init);
> +
> +static void __exit byt_gpio_exit(void)
> +{
> +	platform_driver_unregister(&byt_gpio_driver);
> +}
> +module_exit(byt_gpio_exit);
> 
> (also untested)

It sure does. Want to send a formal patch and I Ack?

> 
> ps: is BayTrail documentation available publicly ?

Check Minnowboard Max :) It's baytrail.

BR, David

> 
> -- 
> balbi


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/