[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <543CEB56.3080009@citrix.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:22:30 +0100
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Martin Kelly <martin@...tingkelly.com>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>, <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
Martin Kelly <martkell@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/setup: add paranoid index check and warning
On 14/10/14 02:19, Martin Kelly wrote:
> In a call to set_phys_range_identity, i-1 is used without checking that
> i is non-zero. Although unlikely, a bug in the code before it could
> cause the value to be 0, leading to erroneous behavior. This patch adds
> a check against 0 value and a corresponding warning.
This can only happen if the toolstack supplies a memory map with zero
entries. I could see justification for adding a panic at the top of
this function in this case, but I can't see the usefulness of this warning.
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
> @@ -671,7 +671,10 @@ char * __init xen_memory_setup(void)
> * PFNs above MAX_P2M_PFN are considered identity mapped as
> * well.
> */
> - set_phys_range_identity(map[i-1].addr / PAGE_SIZE, ~0ul);
> + if (i > 0)
> + set_phys_range_identity(map[i-1].addr / PAGE_SIZE, ~0ul);
> + else
> + WARN(1, "Something went wrong clamping memory to a factor of EXTRA_MEM_RATIO!");
>
> /*
> * In domU, the ISA region is normal, usable memory, but we
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists