lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 10:48:27 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcm/CmHost.c: Fix noisy compile warnings On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 01:03:49PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 22:53 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 09:11:36AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 06:03 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > > > [] > > > > I thought I remember Greg saying something about getting rid of this > > > > driver anyway, but I could be wrong. If Greg decides to keep this > > > > driver around, then I think we should something like your suggestion > > > > above. > > > > > > Or maybe just make the Kconfig depend on X86_32 > > > > What I like about your patches is that they are pure theoretical work > > and I don't have to think about them like regular proper patches with a > > signed off by etc. All the fun, none of the responsibility. > > I've sent a lot of signed-off patches. > These are simple suggestions. > > I think COMPILE_TEST isn't useful here. I don't understand... COMPILE_TEST means runing a static checker on the driver. Why would we not want to do QA? regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists