[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1413446067.2412.51.camel@jtkirshe-mobl>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 00:54:27 -0700
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcm/CmHost.c: Fix noisy compile warnings
On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 10:48 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 01:03:49PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 22:53 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 09:11:36AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 06:03 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > > > []
> > > > > I thought I remember Greg saying something about getting rid of this
> > > > > driver anyway, but I could be wrong. If Greg decides to keep this
> > > > > driver around, then I think we should something like your suggestion
> > > > > above.
> > > >
> > > > Or maybe just make the Kconfig depend on X86_32
> > >
> > > What I like about your patches is that they are pure theoretical work
> > > and I don't have to think about them like regular proper patches with a
> > > signed off by etc. All the fun, none of the responsibility.
> >
> > I've sent a lot of signed-off patches.
> > These are simple suggestions.
> >
> > I think COMPILE_TEST isn't useful here.
>
> I don't understand... COMPILE_TEST means runing a static checker on
> the driver. Why would we not want to do QA?
I think we can drop this patch altogether since I have submitted another
patch to remove this driver from the kernel completely, since Matthias
Beyer (and Greg KH in earlier discussions) suggested we do so.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists