[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141016075650.GB7369@worktop.fdxtended.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 09:56:50 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>,
Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] sched: Revert delayed_put_task_struct() and fix use
after free
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 09:40:44PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> What do you think?
>
> Oleg.
>
> --- x/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ x/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -1165,7 +1165,7 @@ static void task_numa_compare(struct tas
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> cur = ACCESS_ONCE(dst_rq->curr);
> - if (cur->pid == 0) /* idle */
> + if (is_idle_task(cur) || (curr->flags & PF_EXITING))
> cur = NULL;
>
> /*
That makes sense, is_idle_task() is indeed the right function there, and
PF_EXITING avoids doing work where it doesn't make sense.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists