linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] sched: Revert delayed_put_task

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:05:40 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>,
	Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] sched: Revert delayed_put_task_struct() and fix
	use after free

On 10/16, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 05:06:41PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > At least the code like
> >
> > 	rcu_read_lock();
> > 	get_task_struct(foreign_rq->curr);
> > 	rcu_read_unlock();
> >
> > is certainly wrong. And _probably_ the problem should be fixed here. Perhaps
> > we can add try_to_get_task_struct() which does atomic_inc_not_zero() ...
>
> There is an rcu_read_lock() around it through task_numa_compare().

Yes, and the code above has rcu_read_lock() too. But it doesn't help
as Kirill pointed out.

Sorry, didn't have time today to read other emails in this thread,
will do tomorrow and (probably) send the patch which adds PF_EXITING
check.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/