linux-kernel - splice read/write pipe lock ordering issues (was Re: XFS lockdep with Linux v3.17-5503-g35a9ad8af0bb)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141016221434.GF7169@dastard>
Date:	Fri, 17 Oct 2014 09:14:34 +1100
From:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
Cc:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>, xfs@....sgi.com,
	"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk
Subject: splice read/write pipe lock ordering issues (was Re: XFS lockdep
 with Linux v3.17-5503-g35a9ad8af0bb)

[ Adding Al and linux-fsdevel to the cc list ]

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 07:52:43AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Colin reported a lockdep spew with XFS using Linus' tree last week.
> The lockdep report is below.  He noted that his application was using
> splice.

That smells like a splice architecture bug. splice write puts the
pipe lock outside the inode locks, but splice read puts the pipes
locks *inside* the inode locks.

The recent commit 8d02076 "(->splice_write() via ->write_iter()")
which went into 3.16 will be what is causing this. It replaced a
long standing splice lock inversion problem (XFS iolock vs i_mutex
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2011-08/msg00122.html) by moving
to a ->write_iter call under the pipe_lock.

Only XFS reports this issue because XFS is the only filesystem that
serialises splice reads against truncate, concurrent writes into the
same region, extent manipulation functions via fallocate() (e.g.
hole punch), etc. and it does so via the inode iolock that it takes
in shared (read) mode during xfs_file_splice_read().

> josh
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152813
> 
> [14689.265161] ======================================================
> [14689.265175] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> [14689.265186] 3.18.0-0.rc0.git2.1.fc22.x86_64 #1 Not tainted
> [14689.265190] -------------------------------------------------------
> [14689.265199] atomic/1144 is trying to acquire lock:
> [14689.265203]  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13){+.+.+.}, at:
> [<ffffffffa01465ba>] xfs_file_buffered_aio_write.isra.10+0x7a/0x310
> [xfs]
> [14689.265245]
> but task is already holding lock:
> [14689.265249]  (&pipe->mutex/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8126937e>]
> pipe_lock+0x1e/0x20
> [14689.265262]
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
> 
> [14689.265268]
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> [14689.265287]
> -> #2 (&pipe->mutex/1){+.+.+.}:
> [14689.265296]        [<ffffffff810ffde4>] lock_acquire+0xa4/0x1d0
> [14689.265303]        [<ffffffff8183e5b5>] mutex_lock_nested+0x85/0x440
> [14689.265310]        [<ffffffff8126937e>] pipe_lock+0x1e/0x20
> [14689.265315]        [<ffffffff8129836a>] splice_to_pipe+0x2a/0x260
> [14689.265321]        [<ffffffff81298b9f>]
> __generic_file_splice_read+0x57f/0x620
> [14689.265328]        [<ffffffff81298c7b>] generic_file_splice_read+0x3b/0x90
> [14689.265334]        [<ffffffffa0145b20>] xfs_file_splice_read+0xb0/0x1e0 [xfs]
> [14689.265350]        [<ffffffff812976ac>] do_splice_to+0x6c/0x90
> [14689.265356]        [<ffffffff81299e7d>] SyS_splice+0x6dd/0x800
> [14689.265362]        [<ffffffff81842f69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

splice read -> iolock(shared) -> pipe lock.

> [14689.265368]
> -> #1 (&(&ip->i_iolock)->mr_lock){++++++}:
> [14689.265424]        [<ffffffff810ffde4>] lock_acquire+0xa4/0x1d0
> [14689.265494]        [<ffffffff810f87be>] down_write_nested+0x5e/0xc0
> [14689.265553]        [<ffffffffa0153529>] xfs_ilock+0xb9/0x1c0 [xfs]
> [14689.265629]        [<ffffffffa01465c7>]
> xfs_file_buffered_aio_write.isra.10+0x87/0x310 [xfs]
> [14689.265693]        [<ffffffffa01468da>] xfs_file_write_iter+0x8a/0x130 [xfs]
> [14689.265749]        [<ffffffff8126019e>] new_sync_write+0x8e/0xd0
> [14689.265811]        [<ffffffff81260a3a>] vfs_write+0xba/0x200
> [14689.265862]        [<ffffffff812616ac>] SyS_write+0x5c/0xd0
> [14689.265912]        [<ffffffff81842f69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

write(2) -> i_mutex -> iolock(exclusive)

> [14689.265963]
> -> #0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13){+.+.+.}:
> [14689.266024]        [<ffffffff810ff45e>] __lock_acquire+0x1b0e/0x1c10
> [14689.266024]        [<ffffffff810ffde4>] lock_acquire+0xa4/0x1d0
> [14689.266024]        [<ffffffff8183e5b5>] mutex_lock_nested+0x85/0x440
> [14689.266024]        [<ffffffffa01465ba>]
> xfs_file_buffered_aio_write.isra.10+0x7a/0x310 [xfs]
> [14689.266024]        [<ffffffffa01468da>] xfs_file_write_iter+0x8a/0x130 [xfs]
> [14689.266024]        [<ffffffff81297ffc>] iter_file_splice_write+0x2ec/0x4b0
> [14689.266024]        [<ffffffff81299b21>] SyS_splice+0x381/0x800
> [14689.266024]        [<ffffffff81842f69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

splice write -> pipe lock -> i_mutex [ -> iolock(exclusive) ]

This reminds me of the mmap_sem and all the problems we have because
we can't serialise page faults against IO path and data manipulation
functions (e.g. hole punch). We shouldn't be repeating that disaster
is we can avoid it....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/