linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] Add ACPI _DSD and unified device properties support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54416CA2.2010701@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 17 Oct 2014 21:23:14 +0200
From:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] Add ACPI _DSD and unified device properties
 support



On 10/17/14 17:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 02:01:33PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> Hving had a couple of chats with Grant and Arnd during LinuxCon EU/LPC, we
>> now have version 5 taking all feedback into account (hopefully).
>>
>> Changes have been made to patch [02/12] and to patches [09-12/12], although
>> in patches [10-12/12] they are fairly minor.  I have retained the Greg's
>> ACK on patch [02/12], because it is essentially the same that have been
>> posted aleady and ACKed by him (Greg, please let me know if I shouldn't
>> do that) and all the ACKs on the remaining patches except for patch [09/12]
>> which is substantially different.  Still, if reviewers think that their
>> ACKs don't apply any more, please let me know and I'll remove them.
> 
> No objection from me to keep my ACK on those patches, thanks for asking.
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Mine certainly still apply as well.

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/