linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] Add ACPI _DSD and unified device properties support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1787777.qrmnDZUWyu@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Fri, 17 Oct 2014 23:49:45 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] Add ACPI _DSD and unified device properties support

On Friday, October 17, 2014 05:40:07 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 02:01:33PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> > 
> > Hving had a couple of chats with Grant and Arnd during LinuxCon EU/LPC, we
> > now have version 5 taking all feedback into account (hopefully).
> > 
> > Changes have been made to patch [02/12] and to patches [09-12/12], although
> > in patches [10-12/12] they are fairly minor.  I have retained the Greg's
> > ACK on patch [02/12], because it is essentially the same that have been
> > posted aleady and ACKed by him (Greg, please let me know if I shouldn't
> > do that) and all the ACKs on the remaining patches except for patch [09/12]
> > which is substantially different.  Still, if reviewers think that their
> > ACKs don't apply any more, please let me know and I'll remove them.
> 
> No objection from me to keep my ACK on those patches, thanks for asking.

Well, that's just fair IMO. :-)

Does [09/12] look good too in particular?

Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/