[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141017090214.24eeef30@mschwide>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 09:02:14 +0200
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: oleg@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/kmod: fix use-after-free of the
sub_infostructure
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 06:30:29 +0900
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp> wrote:
> Regarding UMH_NO_WAIT, the sub_info structure can be freed by
> __call_usermodehelper() before the worker thread returns from
> do_execve(), allowing memory corruption when do_execve() failed
> after exec_mmap() is called.
>
> Regarding UMH_WAIT_EXEC, the call to umh_complete() allows
> call_usermodehelper_exec() to continue which then frees sub_info.
>
> To fix this race, we need to make sure that the call to
> call_usermodehelper_freeinfo() in call_usermodehelper_exec() is
> always made after the last store to sub_info->retval.
I like this improved description for the UMH_NO_WAIT and UMH_WAIT_EXEC
cases. I mix it with parts of the original description.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists