[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5443F319.4000303@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 10:21:29 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Mariusz Gorski <marius.gorski@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-Sparse <linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Sparse warning: "initializer entry defined twice" - sparse can't
handle bool?
[adding linux-sparse mailing list]
On 10/19/14 02:46, Mariusz Gorski wrote:
> Sparse throws the following warning, which I can't really understand:
>
> $ make drivers/staging/vt6655/ C=2
> [...]
> CHECK drivers/staging/vt6655/datarate.c
> drivers/staging/vt6655/datarate.c:302:40: warning: Initializer entry
> defined twice
> drivers/staging/vt6655/datarate.c:302:46: also defined here
>
> The code looks fine to me:
> bool bAutoRate[MAX_RATE] = {true, true, true, true, false, false,
> true, true, true, true, true, true};
>
> I've googled it and found only this LKML discussion:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/7/31
>
> I've tested the suggested code sample and here are the results:
> $ cat foo.c
> typedef _Bool bool;
> enum {
> false = 0,
> true = 1
> };
> static const bool foo[10] = {
> true,
> true,
> false,
> false,
> };
>
> $ sparse foo.c
> foo.c:7:8: warning: Initializer entry defined twice
> foo.c:8:8: also defined here
>
> It this a sparse problem?
>
> Thanks,
> Mariusz
> --
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists