lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 19 Oct 2014 11:46:29 +0200
From:	Mariusz Gorski <marius.gorski@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Sparse warning: "initializer entry defined twice" - sparse can't
 handle bool?

Sparse throws the following warning, which I can't really understand:

$ make drivers/staging/vt6655/ C=2
[...]
  CHECK   drivers/staging/vt6655/datarate.c
drivers/staging/vt6655/datarate.c:302:40: warning: Initializer entry
defined twice
drivers/staging/vt6655/datarate.c:302:46:   also defined here

The code looks fine to me:
bool bAutoRate[MAX_RATE]    = {true, true, true, true, false, false,
true, true, true, true, true, true};

I've googled it and found only this LKML discussion:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/7/31

I've tested the suggested code sample and here are the results:
$ cat foo.c
typedef _Bool bool;
enum {
     false = 0,
     true = 1
};
static const bool foo[10] = {
       true,
       true,
       false,
       false,
};

$ sparse foo.c
foo.c:7:8: warning: Initializer entry defined twice
foo.c:8:8:   also defined here

It this a sparse problem?

Thanks,
Mariusz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists