[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141021114949.GA3465@developer>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 07:49:51 -0400
From: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
To: Yao Dongdong <yaodongdong@...wei.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Thermal:Remove usless if(!result) before return tz
Hello Yao,
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:34:37AM +0800, Yao Dongdong wrote:
>
> On 2014/10/20 20:10, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > Hello Yao
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 04:27:59PM +0800, Yao Dongdong wrote:
> >> result is always zero when comes here.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by:yaodongdong@...wei.com
> >>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 3 +--
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> >> index 5b7d466..19cac8e 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> >> @@ -1568,8 +1568,7 @@ struct thermal_zone_device *thermal_zone_device_register(const char *type,
> >>
> >> thermal_zone_device_update(tz);
> >>
> >> - if (!result)
> >> - return tz;
> >> + return tz;
> >>
> > Adding a return here will make the resource release below not reachable
> > in the fail path.
>
> But all fails above followed a "goto unregister", so i think it must be successful when come here.
Yes, I see your point. Agreed.
Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
>
> Thanks.
>
> >> unregister:
> >> release_idr(&thermal_tz_idr, &thermal_idr_lock, tz->id);
> >> --
> >> 1.8.0.1
> >>
> >>
>
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists