| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <3778374.avm26S62SZ@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:09:27 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] OOM, PM: OOM killed task shouldn't escape PM suspend
On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 09:27:14 AM Michal Hocko wrote:
> PM freezer relies on having all tasks frozen by the time devices are
> getting frozen so that no task will touch them while they are getting
> frozen. But OOM killer is allowed to kill an already frozen task in
> order to handle OOM situtation. In order to protect from late wake ups
> OOM killer is disabled after all tasks are frozen. This, however, still
> keeps a window open when a killed task didn't manage to die by the time
> freeze_processes finishes.
>
> Reduce the race window by checking all tasks after OOM killer has been
> disabled. This is still not race free completely unfortunately because
> oom_killer_disable cannot stop an already ongoing OOM killer so a task
> might still wake up from the fridge and get killed without
> freeze_processes noticing. Full synchronization of OOM and freezer is,
> however, too heavy weight for this highly unlikely case.
>
> Introduce and check oom_kills counter which gets incremented early when
> the allocator enters __alloc_pages_may_oom path and only check all the
> tasks if the counter changes during the freezing attempt. The counter
> is updated so early to reduce the race window since allocator checked
> oom_killer_disabled which is set by PM-freezing code. A false positive
> will push the PM-freezer into a slow path but that is not a big deal.
>
> Fixes: f660daac474c6f (oom: thaw threads if oom killed thread is frozen before deferring)
> Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 3.2+
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
> ---
> include/linux/oom.h | 3 +++
> kernel/power/process.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> mm/oom_kill.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> mm/page_alloc.c | 8 ++++++++
> 4 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/oom.h b/include/linux/oom.h
> index 647395a1a550..e8d6e1058723 100644
> --- a/include/linux/oom.h
> +++ b/include/linux/oom.h
> @@ -50,6 +50,9 @@ static inline bool oom_task_origin(const struct task_struct *p)
> extern unsigned long oom_badness(struct task_struct *p,
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg, const nodemask_t *nodemask,
> unsigned long totalpages);
> +
> +extern int oom_kills_count(void);
> +extern void note_oom_kill(void);
> extern void oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
> unsigned int points, unsigned long totalpages,
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg, nodemask_t *nodemask,
> diff --git a/kernel/power/process.c b/kernel/power/process.c
> index 4ee194eb524b..a397fa161d11 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/process.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/process.c
> @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ static int try_to_freeze_tasks(bool user_only)
> int freeze_processes(void)
> {
> int error;
> + int oom_kills_saved;
>
> error = __usermodehelper_disable(UMH_FREEZING);
> if (error)
> @@ -131,12 +132,40 @@ int freeze_processes(void)
>
> printk("Freezing user space processes ... ");
> pm_freezing = true;
> + oom_kills_saved = oom_kills_count();
> error = try_to_freeze_tasks(true);
> if (!error) {
> - printk("done.");
> __usermodehelper_set_disable_depth(UMH_DISABLED);
> oom_killer_disable();
> +
> + /*
> + * There might have been an OOM kill while we were
> + * freezing tasks and the killed task might be still
> + * on the way out so we have to double check for race.
> + */
> + if (oom_kills_count() != oom_kills_saved) {
> + struct task_struct *g, *p;
> +
> + read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> + for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
> + if (p == current || freezer_should_skip(p) ||
> + frozen(p))
> + continue;
> + error = -EBUSY;
> + goto out_loop;
> + }
> +out_loop:
Well, it looks like this will work here too:
for_each_process_thread(g, p)
if (p != current && !frozen(p) &&
!freezer_should_skip(p)) {
error = -EBUSY;
break;
}
or I am helplessly misreading the code.
> + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> +
> + if (error) {
> + __usermodehelper_set_disable_depth(UMH_ENABLED);
> + printk("OOM in progress.");
> + goto done;
> + }
> + }
> + printk("done.");
> }
> +done:
> printk("\n");
> BUG_ON(in_atomic());
>
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index bbf405a3a18f..5340f6b91312 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -404,6 +404,23 @@ static void dump_header(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
> dump_tasks(memcg, nodemask);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Number of OOM killer invocations (including memcg OOM killer).
> + * Primarily used by PM freezer to check for potential races with
> + * OOM killed frozen task.
> + */
> +static atomic_t oom_kills = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> +
> +int oom_kills_count(void)
> +{
> + return atomic_read(&oom_kills);
> +}
> +
> +void note_oom_kill(void)
> +{
> + atomic_inc(&oom_kills);
> +}
> +
> #define K(x) ((x) << (PAGE_SHIFT-10))
> /*
> * Must be called while holding a reference to p, which will be released upon
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index cb573b10af12..efccbbadd7c9 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2286,6 +2286,14 @@ __alloc_pages_may_oom(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> }
>
> /*
> + * PM-freezer should be notified that there might be an OOM killer on its
> + * way to kill and wake somebody up. This is too early and we might end
> + * up not killing anything but false positives are acceptable.
> + * See freeze_processes.
> + */
> + note_oom_kill();
> +
> + /*
> * Go through the zonelist yet one more time, keep very high watermark
> * here, this is only to catch a parallel oom killing, we must fail if
> * we're still under heavy pressure.
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists