[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+H2tpGJuukXZuGwysa5Y6LvjgZj3TVDWfngpM67p3nfzdi0YQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 21:34:41 +0800
From: Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>
To: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...eadtrum.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"jslaby@...e.cz" <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"m-karicheri2@...com" <m-karicheri2@...com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>,
"rrichter@...ium.com" <rrichter@...ium.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Geng Ren ( 任赓) <geng.ren@...eadtrum.com>,
Zhizhou Zhang ( 张治洲)
<zhizhou.zhang@...eadtrum.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
sprdlinux <sprdlinux@...elists.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] tty/serial: Add earlycon support for Spreadtrum
serial driver
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 8:26 PM, One Thousand Gnomes
<gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 18:23:38 +0800
> Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 5:06 AM, One Thousand Gnomes
>> <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 17:54:25 +0800
>> > Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...eadtrum.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Add serial driver for spreadtrum sharkl platform with earlycon
>> >> support at first.
>> >
>> >> +#define UART_TXD 0x0000
>> >> +#define UART_RXD 0x0004
>> >> +#define UART_STS0 0x0008
>> >> +#define UART_STS1 0x000C
>> >> +#define UART_IEN 0x0010
>> >> +#define UART_ICLR 0x0014
>> >> +#define UART_CTL0 0x0018
>> >> +#define UART_CTL1 0x001C
>> >> +#define UART_CTL2 0x0020
>> >> +#define UART_CLKD0 0x0024
>> >> +#define UART_CLKD1 0x0028
>> >> +#define UART_STS2 0x002C
>> >> +
>> >> +/*line status */
>> >> +#define UART_LSR_TX_OVER (0x1<<15)
>> >
>> > Given we use UART_ for all the 8250 defines it might be better to use
>> > something else - SHARK_LSR_TX_OVER etc to avoid future confusion
>> >
>>
>> Does it matter if those macro are only used in the specific c file?
>> >From my point of view, private register macro could be treated as
>> static definitions like static variable or functions in C file.
>> I also noted that many people use a prefix for the other
>> manufacturers' macro definition in source file .
>> I have no intention to break the habit of kernel but just for discussion.
>
> Your problem is this. In the kernel headers are definitions like
>
> include/uapi/linux/serial_reg.h:#define UART_TX 0 /* Out: Transmit
> buffer */
>
> you are adding identical (but conflicting in places) defines. If some
> random change in the include files causes serial_reg.h to be included by
> a header you include then it will break.
>
> In addition people habitually use tools like LXR to figure out where
> defines and functions are.
This make much more sense, thanks for you explanation.
> Having these conflicting definitions will
> cause confusion. Better they have prefixes.
>
> Alan
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists