linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/deadline: don't need to check SD_BALANCE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:38:02 +0100
From:	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To:	Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/deadline: don't need to check SD_BALANCE_FORK

Hi,

On 21/10/14 13:18, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> Cc Juri,
> 
> 于 10/14/14, 10:22 AM, Wanpeng Li 写道:
>> There is no need to do balance during fork since SCHED_DEADLINE 
>> tasks can't fork. This patch avoid the SD_BALANCE_FORK check.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  kernel/sched/deadline.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>> index abfaf3d..f46b7f1 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>> @@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ select_task_rq_dl(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int sd_flag, int flags)
>>  	struct task_struct *curr;
>>  	struct rq *rq;
>>  
>> -	if (sd_flag != SD_BALANCE_WAKE && sd_flag != SD_BALANCE_FORK)
>> +	if (sd_flag != SD_BALANCE_WAKE)
>>  		goto out;
>>  
>>  	rq = cpu_rq(cpu);

Yes, makes sense.

Thanks,

- Juri

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/