[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141021172527.GH3219@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 19:25:27 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, riel@...hat.com,
mgorman@...e.de, oleg@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com,
minchan@...nel.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dave@...olabs.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Another go at speculative page faults
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:23:40PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > My Ivy Bridge EP (2*10*2) has a ~58% improvement in pagefault throughput:
> >
> > PRE:
> > 149,441,555 page-faults ( +- 1.25% )
> >
> > POST:
> > 236,442,626 page-faults ( +- 0.08% )
>
> > My Ivy Bridge EX (4*15*2) has a ~78% improvement in pagefault throughput:
> >
> > PRE:
> > 105,789,078 page-faults ( +- 2.24% )
> >
> > POST:
> > 187,751,767 page-faults ( +- 2.24% )
>
> I guess the 'PRE' and 'POST' numbers should be flipped around?
Nope, its the number of page-faults serviced in a fixed amount of time
(60 seconds), therefore higher is better.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists