linux-kernel - Re: vga and 64-bit memcpy's

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFwidVm7yp8JfketFULDfH5djdKWHZ1CVZ=xWc59mponsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:53:00 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: vga and 64-bit memcpy's

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com> wrote:
>
> was tested and found to work, just a question if we care enough to fix
> it I suppose.

Well, we might not care deeply, but at the same time I also do think
that we don't care deeply about the alleged performance advantages of
having that special scr_memmovew() hack.

So I think I'd apply a real (and tested) patch to just remove the
special VT_BUF_HAVE_MEM{CPY|MOVE}W if I got one.

                    Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/