[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <31425128.N5J4K0nt32@diego>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:00:29 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
Cc: dianders@...omium.org, sonnyrao@...omium.org,
addy.ke@...k-chips.com, cf@...k-chips.com, xjq@...k-chips.com,
hj@...k-chips.com, huangtao@...k-chips.com,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Marc Carino <marc.ceeeee@...il.com>,
Rohit Vaswani <rvaswani@...eaurora.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] ARM: rockchip: add option to access the pmu via a phandle in smp_operations
Hi Kever,
Am Mittwoch, 15. Oktober 2014, 10:23:01 schrieb Kever Yang:
> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
>
> Makes it possible to define a rockchip,pmu phandle in the cpus node directly
> referencing the pmu syscon instead of searching for specific compatible.
>
> The old way of finding the pmu stays of course available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
> Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
I've tested the series again on all our supported platforms - no regressions.
The series itself also looks nice and ready to go to me, but I think we'll
need to give the devicetree maintainers some more days, if they want to
complain about our new rockchip,pmu property.
Heiko
> ---
>
> Changes in v5: None
> Changes in v4:
> - add rockchip,pmu property into cpus.txt
>
> Changes in v3:
> - add this patch
>
> Changes in v2: None
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 9 +++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt index fc44634..b2aacbe
> 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt
> @@ -227,6 +227,15 @@ nodes to be present and contain the properties
> described below. # List of phandles to idle state nodes supported
> by this cpu [3].
>
> + - rockchip,pmu
> + Usage: optional for systems that have an "enable-method"
> + property value of "rockchip,rk3066-smp"
> + While optional, it is the preferred way to get access to
> + the cpu-core power-domains.
> + Value type: <phandle>
> + Definition: Specifies the syscon node controlling the cpu core
> + power domains.
> +
> Example 1 (dual-cluster big.LITTLE system 32-bit):
>
> cpus {
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
> b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c index 4c36fbf..57b53b3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
> @@ -155,6 +155,19 @@ static int __init rockchip_smp_prepare_pmu(void)
> struct device_node *node;
> void __iomem *pmu_base;
>
> + /*
> + * This function is only called via smp_ops->smp_prepare_cpu().
> + * That only happens if a "/cpus" device tree node exists
> + * and has an "enable-method" property that selects the SMP
> + * operations defined herein.
> + */
> + node = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus");
> +
> + pmu = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(node, "rockchip,pmu");
> + of_node_put(node);
> + if (!IS_ERR(pmu))
> + return 0;
> +
> pmu = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("rockchip,rk3066-pmu");
> if (!IS_ERR(pmu))
> return 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists