[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5447E56D.6000006@broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:12:13 -0700
From: Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Christian Daudt <bcm@...thebug.org>,
Matt Porter <mporter@...aro.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"Kumar Gala" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
Antti Palosaari <crope@....fi>,
JD Zheng <jdzheng@...adcom.com>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Richardson <jonathar@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] ARM: cygnus: Initial support for Broadcom Cygnus
SoC
On 14-10-22 01:22 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 October 2014 17:11:08 Scott Branden wrote:
>> OK, I will remove the "iProc SoC based Machine types". This was
>> grouping all iProc based SoCs under one menu and parallels what the
>> existing "Broadcom Mobile Soc Support" menu does.
>>
>> I can create another patch removing the "Broadcom Mobile SoC Support"
>> menu if the ARM Maintainer now want all Broadcom devices are supposed to
>> be contained in a single level?
>
> Sounds good, I missed that other menu going in.
I will add another patch to my set to correct this.
>
> It can make sense to add 'comment' statements if you want to separate the
> families.
Thanks - I will add this to my patchset.
>
> I also noticed that there are a few configuration options that at first
> seem pointless: ARCH_BCM_MOBILE_L2_CACHE and ARCH_BCM_MOBILE_SMP. I wonder
> if it ever makes sense to disable these when the common options (CACHE_L2X0
> and SMP) are enabled for another SoC. I'd normally like to see these as
> hidden options that are always on whenever the core support for those
> features is enabled, to avoid confusing users as well as bugs from the
> combinatorial explosion.
I can clean up all but ARCH_BCM_MOBILE_L2_CACHE. This one is
intertwined with SMC support and it looks like they want the option to
turn on and off this feature. This L2/Trustzone support will need to be
cleaned up at a later time. I heard Russell King says the PL310 cache
code will be changing again soon. When I add PL310 Trustzone support
for the Cygnus SoC I can have a look at cleaning it up for the
Mobile/Kona base SoCs at the same time.
>
> Arnd
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists